Arizona bill would block early ballot drop-offs at polls on Election Day

PHOENIX — Republican senators voted Wednesday to block those who get early ballots from simply dropping them off on Election Day.

SB 1046 would not deny the right to vote to those who don’t drop their ballots into the mail in time to arrive by Election Day. They would still get the right to cast a regular ballot at a polling place.

That, however, would mean standing in line with everyone else to wait their turn to provide identification and for an available voting booth, rather than simply dropping the ballot into a sealed box. And that additional hurdle, said Sen. Lisa Otondo, D-Yuma, will result in disenfranchising voters.

But Sen. Michelle Ugenti-Rita, R-Scottsdale, who crafted the measure, rejected that contention. She said the requirements would apply to all, regardless of political party or any other factors.

That didn’t satisfy Sen. Juan Mendez, D-Tempe, who said it isn’t necessary to single out any group for special treatment for a measure to have disparate effects. He suggested the legislation was “the new Jim Crow,” referring to laws in the Deep South through the 1950s that were designed to suppress black votes and enforce racial segregation.

What’s behind the measure are contentions by proponents that it takes too long for voters to get election results. Ugenti-Rita blames that on people leaving early ballots at polling places, meaning election officials don’t start counting them until after all the election-day ballots are tallied.

The situation drew particular attention last November when some candidates who appeared to be winning when early returns came in ended up losing after all the early votes were counted. And in virtually every case, the vote swing from those late-submitted early ballots was toward Democrats.

Despite questions and charges raised by the Arizona Republican Party there was never any hard evidence of any fraud. But Sen. J.D. Mesnard, R-Chandler, said that’s irrelevant.

“The longer it takes to count ballots, the more elections races are in question during that process, the more people start to lose faith in that process,” he said.

Sen. Sylvia Allen, R-Snowflake, said the legislation will “bring some confidence back to our elections” rather than people “waiting days and days and days for votes to be counted, wondering, and people imagining all kinds of things about why the delay, why it takes so long.”

But Sen. Martin Quezada, D-Phoenix, said the trade-off is forcing people who want to wait until the last minute to forfeit the easy ability to simply drop off their ballots on Election Day and instead face the possibility of long lines.

And Quezada cited the 2016 state presidential preference primary in which Republican Marco Rubio dropped out a week before Election Day. That left Rubio supporters who voted early out of luck as there is no way to recall those mailed-in early ballots.

Mendez said he’s one of those people who purposely delays casting his ballot.

“It’s a strategic position,” he said. “I do this because I know someone’s going to say something that’s the equivalent of putting their foot in their mouth or they’re just going to show their true colors. I want to wait until the very last day.”

Ugenti-Rita was unsympathetic.

“Remember, the system is called ‘vote by mail,’” she said. “But you need to mail it back.”

Ugenti-Rita also said no one is forced to vote by mail. And if they do get an early ballot and can’t — or won’t — get it into the mail on time to arrive by Election Day, they can still vote a regular ballot.

But Sen. Andrea Dalessandro, D-Green Valley, said if the goal of the legislation is to speed election returns this is precisely the wrong thing to do.

She said that the election systems in Cochise, Gila, Greenlee, La Paz, Mohave, Pima, Pinal and Santa Cruz counties are not set up to be able to tell whether someone who shows up at a polling place already has cast an early ballot.

What that means, Dalessandro said, is these people will have to cast “provisional” ballots. These are set aside and not counted until after the records are checked, after all the other counting.

And that, she said, means it will take even longer to get election results.

The debate at one point got heated when Mendez said it isn’t necessary for legislation to target one class of people to have the effect of disenfranchising voters.

“Have you all not heard about the new Jim Crow?” he asked.

Mesnard shot back that Mendez was saying lawmakers support the bill for racist reasons. And that, he said, violates Senate rules.

The measure still needs a roll-call vote before going to the House.

Subscribe for just 99¢ per week
  • Support quality journalism
  • Get unlimited access to and apps
  • No more surveys blocking articles
%d bloggers like this: